"Insinöörit ja Arkkitehdit" haastaneet NISTin oikeuteen tämän tutkimuksen pohjalta...

Risto Koivula, 4/18/2020 6:33:21 AM, 403007

https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/RFC-to-NIST-WTC7-Report-04-15-20.pdf


April 15, 2020

Catherine Fletcher Director, NIST Management and Organization Office National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 3220 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-3220

Re: Request for Correction Under the Data Quality Act to NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

Dear Ms. Fletcher:

This petition is a request for correction of information disseminated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”). This Request for Correction (the “Request”) is being submitted by 10 family members of people killed on September 11, 2001, by 88 architects and structural engineers, and by the organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (referred to herein collectively as “Requesters”). It is being submitted under Section 515 of Public Law 106-554 (commonly known as the Data Quality Act or Information Quality Act;herein referred to as the “DQA”), the Office of Management and Budget’s (“OMB’s”) government-wide Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility,and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies (the “OMB Guidelines”),and NIST’s “Guidelines,Information Quality Standards,and Administrative Mechanism” (the “NIST IQS”).

This Request is being submitted as a single document signed by multiple Requesters in order to avoid submitting duplicative Requests. However, each Requester reserves the right to appeal the outcome of NIST’s determination of the merits of this Request either jointly or severally,in each Requester’s sole discretion. Requesters prefer to be con- tacted via email through the designated representative of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth whenever possible. Requesters also request that NIST not distribute the Requesters’ contact information listed below to anyone not officially involved in addressing this Request. If this Request is published on NIST’s website or elsewhere, a redacted version should be published omitting the Requesters’ contact information.

The information that is the subject of this Request is NIST’s Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1A) and NIST’s Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7 (NCSTAR 1-9), collectively referred to herein as the “NIST WTC 7 Report.”

Secondarily, NIST’s webpage titled FAQs – NIST WTC 7 Investigation (referred to herein as the “NIST WTC 7 FAQs”) is also the subject of this Request. The NIST WTC 7 Report can be found at the following NIST webpage:

https://www.nist.gov/el/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation

(last visited April 14, 2020). The NIST WTC 7 FAQs can be found at the following NIST webpage:

https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-studies/faqs-nist-wtc-7-investigation

(last visited April 14, 2020).

As described more fully below, the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs contain information that clearly violates the DQA, the OMB Guidelines, and the NIST IQS, and such violations significantly and adversely affect Requesters. The items of information that fail to comply with the DQA, the OMB Guidelines, and the NIST IQS, presented in Section V of this Request in two parts, are as follows (at the pages of this Request referenced):

Part 1: NIST’s Computer Simulations

A. Column 79 Side Plate (page 8)

B. Thermal Expansion of Beam K3004 (page 15) C. Girder A2001 Web Stiffeners (page 18)

D. Reported Cascade of Floor Failures (page 22)

E. NIST’s Global Collapse Analyses (page 26)

Part 2: NIST’s Omission and Distortion of Evidence of Explosions and Incendiaries

F. Seismogram Data (page 49)

G. Eyewitness and Audio Evidence of Explosions (page 55)

H. Severely Eroded Steel from WTC 7 (page 80)

I. THE NIST WTC 7 REPORT AND THE NIST WTC 7 FAQs CONTAIN INFORMATION UNDER THE NIST IQS

The NIST IQS defines information as follows (see NIST IQS, Part I, Definitions):

Information means any communication or representation of knowledge such as facts or data, in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual forms. This definition includes information that an agency disseminates from a Web page but does not include the provision of hyperlinks to information that others disseminate. This definition does not include opinions, where the agency’s presentation makes it clear that what is being offered is someone’s opinion rather than fact or the agency’s views.

Information contained in the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs falls under the definition of information because it is a communication of facts and data. Information contained in the NIST WTC 7 FAQs specifically falls under the definition of information because it is information disseminated from a webpage. Furthermore, nowhere within the NIST WTC 7 Report or the NIST WTC 7 FAQs does NIST “make it clear that what is being offered is someone’s opinion rather than fact or the agency’s views.” NIST states that, although it consulted an outside advisory committee, “The content of the reports and recommendations ... are solely the responsibility of NIST.” (See NCSTAR 1A, p. xxx.) NIST, through the National Construction Safety Team Act (Pub. Law 107-231, 15 U.S.C. §7301 et seq.) (the “NCST Act”) is required by law to generate such information. (See 15 U.S.C. §7301 et seq.) Thus, the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs contain information that is covered by the DQA and the NIST IQS.


II. THE NIST WTC 7 REPORT AND THE NIST WTC 7 FAQs WERE DISSEMINATED BY NIST

The NIST IQS defines dissemination as follows (see NIST IQS, Part I, Definitions):

Dissemination means agency initiated or sponsored distribution of information to the public. Dissemination does not include distribution limited to government employees or agency contractors or grantees; intra- or inter-agency use or sharing of government information; and responses to requests for agency records under the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, the Federal Advisory Committee Act or other similar law. This definition also does not include distribution limited to correspondence with individuals or persons, press releases, archival records, public filings, subpoenas or adjudicative processes.

The NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs were clearly disseminated by NIST. Specifically, NIST was required by law to generate the NIST WTC 7 Report under the NCST Act and did in fact generate the NIST WTC 7 Report in November 2008. (See 15 U.S.C. § 7307 mandating the issuance of a final public report follo-wing the investigation.) The NIST WTC 7 Report was disseminated by NIST via the following webpage:

https://www.nist.gov/el/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation.

The NIST WTC 7 FAQs were disseminated by NIST via the following webpage:

https://www.nist.gov/topics/disaster-failure-studies/faqs-nist-wtc-7-investigation.

Thus, the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs were disseminated by NIST.


III. CORRECTION OF THE NIST WTC 7 REPORT AND THE NIST WTC 7 FAQs WOULD SERVE A USEFUL PURPOSE

Under the NIST IQS, no initial request for correction will be considered concerning “disseminated information the correction of which would serve no useful purpose.” (See NIST IQS, Part III(B)(3).)

This exception clearly does not apply to this Request. The horrendous attacks of September 11, 2001, were the worst attacks on American soil since Pearl Harbor, and perhaps the worst such attacks in the history of the United States. Nearly 3,000 people died on 9/11, and the vast majority of them died in the World Trade Center. Just as many or more have died after 9/11 as a result of exposure to the toxic and corrosive materials that contaminated the air following the collapse of WTC 7, WTC 1, and WTC 2.

NIST was statutorily tasked with telling the 9/11 victims’ families, the building and fire safety industries, the American people, and the U.S. government how and why WTC 7 collapsed. If NIST, through the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs, has disseminated inaccurate, unreliable, or biased information about the collapse of the WTC 7, the implications would stretch across the entire architectural and political landscape.

First, the dissemination by NIST of inaccurate, unreliable, or biased information concerning the collapse of WTC 7 may lead to (and may have already led to) the adoption of unnecessary and improper changes to building codes, standards, and practices. These changes to building codes, standards, and practices could, in turn, lead to needless deaths and injuries if such codes and standards are too lenient or to unnecessary expenses if they are too strict.

Second, immense political and policy ramifications would flow from the correction of inaccurate, unreliable, or biased information disseminated by NIST concerning the collapse of WTC 7.

Specifically, should the correction of such information render a finding that the collapse of WTC 7 was caused not by fires but by a controlled demolition, it would instantly cast extreme doubt on NIST’s finding that the total destruction of the WTC Towers was caused by the airplane impacts and ensuing fires and would most likely lead to congressional and criminal investigations to identify those responsible for the destruction of all three buildings.

The process and outcome of such investigations would most likely fundamentally reshape the American people’s understanding of the 9/11 attacks and have broad and profound influence on the policies of the U.S. government.

Thus, the degree to which the correction of information contained in the NIST WTC 7 Report and the NIST WTC 7 FAQs would serve a useful purpose cannot be overstated.


... "


He väittävät erityisesti, että tämä kriitisen pilarin (79), primaaripakin ja sekundaarin välipohjaplkin liitos ei olisi voinut hajota vain pasta ja vaurioista. (Ei sen kyllä olisi tarvinnutkaan hajota - riittää, että se koko paketti olisi voinut siirtyä sen 40 cm primaaripalkin suunnassa muualla taphtuneiden vaurioiden vaikutukseata.)



Tämä kriittinen palkkilinja siirtyy kimppunurjahduksessa 40 cm pohjoiseen eli pitkää yhdensuuntaiata sivua kohti (eikä etelään kuten alkuviestissä on virheellisesti).



NIST sanoo, että tulipalo rikkoi noiden sekunaaripakkien ja teräsbetonisten välipohjien välisen liitoksen, koska teräs kuumenee paljon nopeammin, koska on paljon parempi lämmönjohdin, ja palon jäätyessä rikkontuneet ja murentu- neet elementtien päät eivät pysyneet entisillä kiinnityksillään eivätkä mahtuneet niihin, mikä rikkoi niitä entisestään lisää, ja lopulta pudotti elemnttejä. Tätä on mahdotonta simuloida, mutta siitä omn tehty kokeita. Trutherit eivät taida mainita tästäkään mitään. NISTin JOHTOPÄÄTÖSTEN ei tarvitse olla ikuisia, niitä voidaan myöhemminkin muuttaa, aivan kuten vaikka hoitosuosituksiakin (itse asiassa jenkkien "recommendations" on määräykset (kehotukset), ja tämä on vielä sanan perusmerkityksin, Suomen "hoitosuosuositukset" on käännösvirhe, jos se tarkoittaa sellaisia määräyksiä, joiden rikkomosesta joutuu edesvastuuseen). Näen tässä ensimmäistä kertaa tuon välipohjan todellisen rakenteen. puhun edellä virheellisesti "rakennuksen pituussunnassa olevista elementeistä" ("TT-laatoista"). Rakenne on hontelompi kuin osasin arvatakaan.

Muokannut: Risto Koivula, 4/18/2020 7:33:29 AM


WTC-iskut 11/9 2001: Virheellinen yliopistotutkimus WTC-7:n romahduksesta   [ 402986 , Risto Koivula , 15.04.2020 05:40:51 ]
    WTC-iskut 11/9 2001 romahduksesta   [ 402987 , sherlocker , 15.04.2020 19:37:33 ]
        WTC-iskut 11/9 2001 romahduksesta   [ 402989 , Risto Koivula , 16.04.2020 10:39:33 ]
            WTC-iskut 11/9 2001 romahduksesta   [ 402990 , Risto Koivula , 16.04.2020 10:52:15 ]
                "Insinöörit ja Arkkitehdit" haastaneet NISTin oikeuteen tämän tutkimuksen pohjalta...   [ 403007 , Risto Koivula , 18.04.2020 06:33:21 ]
                    WTC: Mitä asiasta tyhmästä päästä palstalla ajateltiin, ennen kuin ensimmäistäkään huhua sisäpiirisalaliitosta oli kuultu...   [ 403008 , Risto Koivula , 18.04.2020 09:23:52 ]
                        Voihan perse...   [ 403014 , Risto Koivula , 19.04.2020 02:48:28 ]
                            Voihan perse...   [ 403015 , Risto Koivula , 19.04.2020 05:45:58 ]
                        WTC: Ensimmäiset salkkariviestit palstalla   [ 403017 , Risto Koivula , 19.04.2020 11:26:02 ]
                            Eurodemareiden valuuttapoliittinen Attac-kansalaisjärjestö toi WTC-saliittoteoriat suomalaiseen poliittiseen julkisuuteen   [ 403018 , Risto Koivula , 20.04.2020 08:35:44 ]
                                ATTAC - Halosen huilu...?   [ 403019 , Risto Koivula , 20.04.2020 10:30:05 ]
                                    Ensimmäinen syyskuun 11. terrori-iskuja kriittisesti käsitellyt seminaari pidettiin Helsingissä lauantaina 11.9.2004   [ 403035 , Risto Koivula , 22.04.2020 15:22:54 ]
                                        Ensimmäinen syyskuun 11. terrori-iskuja kriittisesti käsitellyt seminaari pidettiin Helsingissä lauantaina 11.9.2004, ja STT   [ 403036 , Risto Koivula , 22.04.2020 16:15:39 ]